AI GRC SG Community · AI governance

Who should own AI risk: the board, the CIO, the data team — or everyone?

Reply

Every organisation I speak to is experimenting with AI. Far fewer can tell me who is accountable when a model discriminates, leaks data or simply gets it wrong.

Management wants speed; boards want assurance; governance, risk and compliance teams want control. All three are right, and the gap between them is where projects stall — or, worse, ship without oversight.

Angles to consider

  • Does your organisation have a named owner for each AI use case?
  • Where does AI sit on the board agenda — under technology, risk or strategy?
  • Is 'the algorithm decided' ever an acceptable answer to a customer or a regulator?
Dr Jenny Tan
Jenny's opening view

I lean towards shared accountability with a single named owner per use case, and the board setting the risk appetite before anything scales. Practitioners — does that survive contact with reality?

Discussion · 0 replies

  • No replies yet. Be the first to share your view.

Share your view

No account needed. Your email address is never shown.

Enjoying the discussion?

Subscribe to hear about new questions, or invite Jenny to bring the conversation to your organisation.